What is a major consequence of a laissez-faire leadership style?

In a laissez-faire leadership style, leaders take a hands-off approach, allowing employees significant autonomy in their work. This can lead to non-cooperation among team members for several reasons. Without clear direction and oversight from leadership, team members may pursue their individual goals independently, which can result in a lack of synergy and collaboration.

When individuals operate independently without a cohesive strategy or shared objectives, it can foster an environment where communication and collaboration are diminished. Teams may fail to coordinate their efforts effectively, leading to misunderstandings and conflicts. In situations where guidance and structure are lacking, the likelihood of cooperation decreases, as employees may not feel accountable to one another. Thus, the absence of leadership can detract from team cohesion and create an atmosphere where non-cooperation thrives, making this a significant consequence of laissez-faire leadership.

The other options, while potentially beneficial in other contexts, do not usually manifest under a laissez-faire leadership style since the lack of oversight and direction typically does not foster increased motivation, improved project coordination, or enhanced organizational structure.